Skip to content

The Changing Fundamentals of US-China Relations

by Evan S. Medeiros

Longer-term structural and short-term cyclical drivers are both pushing US-China relations in a more competitive direction, while classic buffers and stabilizers are arguably inoperative. US-China competition is, thus, more of a condition than a strategy, leading the former NSC senior director for Asia to argue that calling for competition with China is not enough; the key debates are how the United States competes—with what tools, on what issues, and at what costs.

Download the print version

Unity, Democracy, and Anti-Americanism in China

by Weizhan Meng

Many American scholars and pundits have concluded that US engagement policy toward China has been a failure. Rather than abandon it, a Chinese perspective here proposes how the United States can reform its engagement policy to help make China less anti-American and move toward political diversification and economic liberalization, while simultaneously helping the United States gain more strategic benefits.

Download the print version

India and China: A Managed Nuclear Rivalry?

by Rajesh Basrur

Although tensions seem to have subsided since their 2017 Doklam confrontation, India and China’s essential situation remains unchanged, having entered a nuclear rivalry—sharing five characteristics with five other sets of nuclear-armed rivals—that could, conceivably, and possibly rapidly, deteriorate into sharpened confrontation and crisis.

Download the print version

China, NATO, and the Pitfall of Empty Engagement

by Jonathan Holslag

Even if European allies overcome their reluctance to endorse a role for NATO toward China this fall, engagement needs a strategy, which should ideally consist of these four layers. The failure of NATO to formulate a proper answer to China's ascent could undermine the alliance’s relevance and further increase frustration on both sides of the Atlantic.

Download the print version


Economic Statecraft in the Age of Trump

by Daniel W. Drezner

A statecraft gap is emerging, with the United States getting worse at economic diplomacy just as other countries are getting better. The United States needs to develop a reliable doctrine on when to threaten networked sanctions, how to resist being the target of other actors’ efforts to weaponize interdependence, and how to use carrots as well as sticks.

Download the print version

The BJP’s Puzzling Victory: Was It about Hindu Nationalism?

by Sumit Ganguly and Himanshu Jha

In May 2019, India handed a categorical victory to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Why did it win so resoundingly? And with an anemic opposition, a comfortable majority in parliament, and an able foreign policy team in place, what will the second Modi regime do in its foreign policy?

Download the print version

Great Expectations: Asking Too Much of the US-India Strategic Partnership

by Sameer Lalwani and Heather Byrne

A sustainable US-India strategic collaboration would benefit from some realism about four limitations on the relationship or risk misallocation of resources, miscalculation of strategy, misestimation of leverage, and potentially disappointment, resentment, and hostility from outsized expectations of the US-India partnership.

Download the print version

Does Al Qaeda Have a Future?

by Daniel Byman

After the 2019 defeat of the Islamic State’s territorial caliphate, will Al Qaeda make a comeback? How much of a threat do Al Qaeda and its affiliates pose to the United States and other Western countries today?

Download the print version

Broken Partnerships: Can Washington Get Security Cooperation Right?

by Bilal Y. Saab 

Drawing down militarily in the Middle East and paying more attention to the Indo-Pacific will require that the United States do security cooperation right. But the unpopular truth is that a major ailment of security cooperation is internal to the United States, and it will take nothing short of a dramatic interagency culture change to get it right.

Download the print version

Behind the Headlines

Strong insights from previous issues

Perils of Polarization for U.S. Foreign Policy

by Kenneth A. Schultz

The long-term trend of partisan polarization in US politics has made it more difficult for the United States to conduct foreign policy and wield its diplomatic and military power in the world. How can we mitigate the worst effects? From our Winter 2017 issue.

Download the print version

Presidential Alliance Powers

by Mira Rapp-Hooper and Matthew C. Waxman

The US president wields vast powers that can weaken alliances from within, undermining American treaty guarantees through action or inaction. Congress, however, can influence US alliance management and protect them from eroding. From our Summer 2019 issue.

Download the print version

Will Europe Get Its Own Bomb?

by Bruno Tertrais

The context for a “European nuclear deterrent” is changing. The vague expression, which this paper seeks to define, is clouded by intellectual and political confusion about realistic options. Now would be a good time for all Europeans to re-engage in this nuclear policy debate. From our Summer 2019 issue.

Download the print version

South Korea's Nuclear Hedging

by Lami Kim

Given the enormous potential security and economic costs of obtaining nuclear weapons, Seoul is more likely to pursue nuclear hedging and latency. South Korean President Moon Jae-in's pursuit of nuclear-powered submarines may be part of such a hedging strategy in Seoul. From our Spring 2018 issue.

Download the print version

How Strong is the Nuclear Taboo Today?

by Nina Tannenwald

In a new nuclear era and with the global normative order at risk of unraveling, the author who wrote the classic book on the subject reevaluates the prominence of the taboo and methods for strengthening it ten years later. From our Fall 2018 issue.

Download the print version

The Day after Trump: American Strategy for a New International Order

by Rebecca Friedman Lissner and Mira Rapp-Hooper

Defending the liberal international order as an end unto itself today is a mistake. Instead, foreign policy strategists must begin to craft a new US grand strategy, beginning with reassessing fundamental assumptions of the extant international order, diagnosing threats from without and within, and defining the limits of a new system. From our Spring 2018 issue.

Download the print version

Follow Us on Twitter!

GW is committed to digital accessibility. If you experience a barrier that affects your ability to access content on this page, let us know via the Accessibility Feedback Form.